“(The SHEU survey) was very, very useful. It gave us reassurance we weren’t missing a trick. For example not many pupils in the sample year groups were taking illegal drugs, which re-enforced our opinions. But the survey also raised issues and flagged some things up. We discovered that some of our girls weren’t eating enough – the percentage of girls in our school not eating lunch the day before the survey was higher than the county average. There were other concerns too, specifically around cigarettes, alcohol and attendance.
The school used this data and took a number of actions to address it. More female peer mentors were put in place and the school asked NEXUS (the Extended Schools service) for help, so they developed a programme for girls which addressed their eating patterns, healthy eating, sex education and self-esteem issues.
We ran an anti-bullying group for Year 9 as a preventative measure, based upon data provided by our current Year 10 students.
The travel data revealed that a high number of pupils took the car to school so we involved the BIKE-IT scheme who ran assemblies, brought in their bikes (including one with a pedal-powered smoothie maker!), and raised awareness of health and green issues.
The information about how happy the students were with their lives raised some concerns as far fewer girls were as happy as the boys, so work was done around developing aspirations, role-models and self-esteem."
Adolescence, high risk behaviours, brain development and …
Adolescence, high risk behaviours, brain development and …
A range of “high risk behaviours” become relatively common in adolescence …
Christina Moutsiana and others, in their 2013 paper, “Human development of the ability to learn from bad news”, tested whether the ability to alter beliefs, in response to good and bad news, develops differently with age. They stated that, “… vast resources have been dedicated to educating adolescents about the consequences of their risky behavior. Our results show that this approach may be inherently limited because the ability to appropriately adjust beliefs about vulnerability in response to undesirable information develops disproportionally late between late childhood and adulthood. However, reframing the information to highlight positive outcomes of desired behaviors (e.g., the positive effect of reduced alcohol consumption on sports performance), rather than dangers of undesired ones, may have a larger impact”. (Human development of the ability to learn from bad news. PNAS, Vol. 110 no. 41: 16396–16401).
In their 2009 guide, “The Teen Years Explained: A Guide to Healthy Adolescence” (p.24), Clea McNeely and Jayne Blanchard wrote, “Research is starting to discover that adolescents judge the benefits of partaking in risky behaviors differently than adults do, and this difference in judgment may have a biological basis in the brain” .
Alexander Persoskie reported that “… “Invulnerable” teens—those who gave risk estimates of 0%—accounted for a considerable portion of those who ultimately experienced each outcome.” For example, 53% of those who became pregnant and 63% of the teens who were not enrolled in school had, one year earlier, indicated a 0% chance of these events happening. (How well can adolescents really judge risk? Simple, self reported risk factors out-predict teens’ self estimates of personal risk. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 8, no. 1, January 2013, pp. 1-6).
In The Teen Brain: Still Under Construction article some connections are made between brain function, development, and behavior.
Thanks to Peter Baggetta for his Prezi - Adolescent Brain and Risk Taking
