We have done a variety of customised surveys including the Regional Governors SRE Survey, summarised below.
A report of a survey of Chairs of School Governors carried out in the South-West of England 2002 South-West Regional Health Authority
In association with: Schools Health Education Unit, Exeter
Regional Governor Survey Report
SEX AND RELATIONSHIP EDUCATION
A report of a survey of Chairs of School Governors carried out in the South-West of England 2002
South-West Regional Health Authority
In association with:
Schools Health Education Unit, Exeter
REGIONAL GOVERNOR SURVEY 2002: SEX AND RELATIONSHIP EDUCATION
Summary
A postal survey of chairs of governors of all schools in the South-West was carried out in the Spring of 2002, to determine their awareness of their responsibilities under the new Sex and Relationship Guidance.
About a third of those contacted returned a completed survey form.
Of the respondents, who might be among the more diligent of governors, awareness of the Guidance was not good.
A copy of the full results is available on the SHEU website
www.sheu.org.uk
Introduction
A postal survey of Chairs of Governors was carried out in the Spring of 2002. The purpose of the survey was:
[*] to determine the awareness of Governors of their responsibilities under the new Sex and Relationship Guidance
The survey was planned and organised by a team of people:
Christine MacInnes [Health Development Agency]
Dali Sidebottom [Health Promotion Specialist ]
Brian Mackenzie [South-West Region Teenage Pregnancy Coordinator]
Support was also provided by Simon Goodenough of the National Governor's Council.
The services of the Schools Health Education Unit were used to carry out the survey, and process the resulting data.
METHODS
Each school received a package for the Chair of Governors containing:
[*] letter from Brian Mackenzie Regional Teenage Pregnancy Co-ordinator
[*] survey questionnaire
[*] freepost envelope for return of questionnaire
[*] freepost reply card
If a reply card had not been received by a week after the deadline given, a reminder letter was sent from the SHEU.
The reply card bore the same address label as was used to send the packages out. It also offered the Chair an opportunity to indicate (a) if they would be prepared to take part in a follow-up telephone survey, and (b) to request further training in this topic.
A total of 911 questionnaires were returned from 2375 schools contacted by the end of the Spring, when no more were processed. This 38% response rate is quite typical of a postal survey, but is disappointing in that limited confidence can be given to any inferences about the whole population of schools.
Points for improvement of methods include:
There were not sufficient spare packs for additional questionnaires, envelopes or reply cards to be sent with the reminder letter.
Several schools receiving a reminder letter complained either that the time given for completion was too short, or that the questionnaire had never been received. The SHEU researcher responsible for managing their end of the project also happens to be a Chair of Governors, and was surprised how late the materials were received. Greater allowance could have been made for the logistics of getting the survey to the right person.
Several schools with pupils only from KS1 or KS2 commented that the survey seemed inappropriate for them. While the letter accompanying the survey was from the Teenage Pregnancy Co-ordinator, none of the questions were irrelevant to the primary phase. Nonetheless one comment received from a Chair was that the survey had not been returned because it was "totally inappropriate for a primary school"; another Chair in a First School observed that "as sex education is not required until ... KS2, your survey did not seem relevant and was placed in file 13!". It is not possible to say how common was this reaction among non-responders, but indicates that the relevance to the primary phase could have been emphasised.
The best excuse for not returning the form was: "your questionnaire provoked a lot of discussion ... and we have decided to revisit this whole area at a meeting later in the year. I regret therefore that it is not possible to answer it at present."
QUESTIONNAIRE CONTENT
The survey booklet contained the following questions:
Q1. Is your governing body aware of the contents and implications of the latest 'Sex and Relationship' guidance from the DfES? (July 2000)
Q2. Does your school have a Sex Education/Sex and Relationship Education (SRE) Policy?
Q3. When was the SRE policy last reviewed and updated?
Q4: Is the SRE policy part of a broader Personal, Social & Health Education (PSHE) and Citizenship policy?
Q5: Who was involved in the development of the SRE policy?
Q6: Which of these groups have been informed about the SRE policy?
Q7: In what ways has your SRE policy been put into practice in the school?
Q8: Who delivers SRE in your school?
Q9. Is SRE training included in your school's Professional Development Strategy for Staff?
Q10. How well informed do you feel with regard to your responsibilities for Sex and Relationship Education in the school?
Q11a: Type of school?
Q11b. Does your school have a religious foundation?
Q12. Name of LEA?
Any other comments on Sex and Relationship Education.
A copy of the questionnaire is appended, where the options for answering may be seen.